
Prompt packTextPro
- ChatGPT
- Claude
- Gemini
Marketing✦ Risemi pick
28-Day Content Calendar System
Eleven chained prompts: brief, voice, pillars, hooks, four-week calendar, daily captions, weekly review.
0 copies
$9.996 results

Eleven chained prompts: brief, voice, pillars, hooks, four-week calendar, daily captions, weekly review.
BRAND BRIEF — Northwood Beard Oil
1. Positioning
We help men 28–45 with full beards stop smelling like drugstore musk. We can do this because a third-generation perfumer blends 14 natural notes other beard brands will not pay for.
2. Audience snapshot
- Situation: has worn the same $9 oil for years; wife or colleague has commented on the smell
- Trigger: a wedding, a new job, or the bottle running out
- Tried: "premium" brands that still lean on synthetic musk
- Fears: smelling like a teenager's locker; paying $40 for marketing
3. Promise
A scent people ask about, not one they step away from — within the first week.
4. Voice rules
Do: short declaratives ("Three notes. Zero musk.") / Don't: "elevate your grooming ritual"
...
6. Instruction for future prompts
Use this brief. Never use "elevate", "curated", "ritual". Always name a specific scent note.
Skeptic re-read: "Third-generation perfumer" is doing all the work — if it is not provable on the site, the positioning collapses to "nice smell". Holds only with proof.The brief you paste on top of every marketing prompt for a year: positioning, audience, promise, voice.
PILLAR — "The async standup playbook: how 14 distributed teams dropped the 9 AM call" Keyword: async standup (~1,900/mo) · Intent: informational, late-stage Gap in current top results: none give a template by team size; all assume 5–8 people. H2s: Why the sync standup breaks past 3 time zones / The 3 formats by team size / Slack + Notion templates / What to do when nobody posts / Daily vs weekly / Tools compared honestly Supporting articles 1. "Async standup template (Slack and Notion versions)" — async standup template (~720) · transactional · links to H2 #3 2. "Why your async standup is being ignored — and the 3-line fix" — async standup not working (~210) · informational · H2 #4 3. "Daily or weekly async standup for a 6-person team?" — daily vs weekly standup (~140) · comparison · H2 #5 4. "Async standup across 5+ time zones: what actually works" — async standup timezone (~95) · informational · H2 #1 ... Publishing order: 1, 2, 4 first (quick wins, low competition), pillar in week 3, remaining support weeks 4–6.
One pillar page plus eight supporting articles, each a real search question with keyword, intent and link map.
Subject: Your pricing page is lying to you Preview: Three founders raised prices last month. Two regret it. Headline: The pricing change that costs more than it earns 1. The claim — Raising prices 20% sounds like free margin. For two of three founders I spoke to this month it cut net revenue, because the churn arrived three months later and nobody connected it. 2. The mechanism — Annual customers do not leave on day one. They leave at renewal, which is after you have already celebrated. 3. The numbers — Founder A: +20% price, −11% net revenue by month 5. Founder B: +15%, +9% — the difference was a grandfather clause. 4. What I would do — Raise for new customers only. Measure renewal cohorts for two quarters before touching existing plans. CTA: Reply with your last price change and the month you measured it. I will tell you if you measured too early. Cuts the author will push back on: the opening anecdote about the coffee shop (300 words, no number); the second example that repeats the first; "I think" ×6.
Cut a newsletter issue by a quarter, sharpen the hook and the close, and keep every number and opinion.
Voice rules - Sentence length: 4–10 words. Never a sentence over 14. - Tone: dry, mildly self-deprecating, never preachy. "Okay, controversial:" / "Weirdly, the most-asked question this month" / "Sorry. Also not sorry." - Words used often: actually, okay, weirdly, notes inside, for a real face - Words never used (peers use them): journey, elevate, unlock, glow-up, self-care, ritual, holy grail, obsessed - Emoji: one at the end, never mid-caption. 🌿 or 😌. - Hooks: a contrarian observation stated flat, never a question. - Closes: one short verdict, no CTA. New captions (launch week) 1. Most niacinamide serums are water with a marketing budget. Ours isn't. 🌿 2. Okay, controversial: your skin does not need 12 steps. It needs 3 that work. 3. Tested the new cleanser on a real face for 6 weeks. Notes inside. 4. Weirdly, the most-asked question this month: "safe during pregnancy?" Yes. 5. Discontinued the toner. It wasn't pulling its weight. Sorry. Also not sorry. 😌 ... Drift check: #7 uses a question hook; #9 runs 16 words. Cut both.
Extract your writing voice from ten posts, then draft new captions a long-time follower could not tell apart.
Edited draft AI lessons that take 15 minutes a day. Used by 12,000 professionals in 40 countries. Start your free 5-day trial. Change log - "a revolutionary AI-powered learning experience" → "AI lessons that take 15 minutes a day" — "revolutionary" is a tell; 15 minutes is a number the reader can picture - "empowering professionals worldwide to thrive" → "used by 12,000 professionals in 40 countries" — abstraction replaced with proof - "Begin your transformative journey today" → "Start your free 5-day trial" — the actual offer is more persuasive than the metaphor - cut "seamlessly", "cutting-edge", "unlock" — adjectives with no referent - "trusted by teams" → [NEEDS NUMBER] — kept, but it needs a count or a name Weakest remaining line: "40 countries" is impressive only if the reader is outside the US; consider replacing with a named company.
Tighten a draft by a set percentage, swap vague adjectives for numbers, and log each change with its reason.