Risemi
> Assumption: signed-in users read their own orders and create their own orders as `pending`; every status change after that is made by your server with the `service_role` key, never by the browser.

Audit: `public.orders` (about 1.8M rows)

Rule files applied: `security-rls-basics`, `security-rls-performance`, `security-privileges`, `schema-foreign-key-indexes`, `query-missing-indexes`, `query-composite-indexes`, `schema-data-types`, `schema-constraints`, `lock-short-transactions`, `monitor-explain-analyze`.

Findings, by rule (first 6 of 12)

| # | Severity | Rule | Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CRITICAL | `security-rls-basics` | `orders_insert ... with check (true)` lets anyone who can insert write an order for any `user_id`. Combined with finding 2, an anonymous visitor holding only your public anon key can create orders on behalf of any user. |
| 2 | CRITICAL | `security-privileges` | `grant select, insert, update ... to anon`. Orders belong to signed-in users, so `anon` needs no privilege at all. None of the three policies has a `to` clause, so each applies to every role, including `anon`. |
| 3 | HIGH | `security-privileges` | `authenticated` can `update` every column of its own rows: the owner can still run `update orders set status = 'paid', total_cents = 1` from the browser. |
| 4 | HIGH | `security-rls-basics` | The insert path also trusts `status`: a client can insert a row that is already `status = 'paid'`. |
| 5 | HIGH | `security-rls-performance` | All policies call `auth.uid()` bare, so it is evaluated per row. Wrap it as `(select auth.uid())` so it is evaluated once per statement. |
| 6 | HIGH | `schema-foreign-key-indexes`, `query-missing-indexes` | No index on `user_id`. It is the foreign key, the RLS filter column and the column every "my orders" query filters on. Each RLS-filtered select over 1.8M rows is a sequential scan. |

Fixing migration (file 1 of 2, excerpt)

```sql
set local lock_timeout = '5s';

revoke all on public.orders from anon;
revoke update, delete, truncate, references, trigger on public.orders from authenticated;
grant select, insert on public.orders to authenticated;

drop policy if exists orders_select on public.orders;
drop policy if exists orders_insert on public.orders;
drop policy if exists orders_update on public.orders;

create policy orders_select on public.orders
  for select to authenticated
  using ((select auth.uid()) = user_id);

create policy orders_insert on public.orders
  for insert to authenticated
  with check ((select auth.uid()) = user_id and status = 'pending');
-- No update or delete policy: denied for every role except service_role.
```

File 2 holds only `create index concurrently if not exists orders_user_id_created_at_idx on public.orders (user_id, created_at desc);` because `concurrently` cannot run inside the transaction the Supabase CLI wraps around each migration.

[The full answer continues with findings 7–12, the lock plan for 1.8M rows, the status and total_cents check constraints added `not valid` then validated, an `explain analyze` to run before and after, and one RLS test per role.]
Example output (run in Claude Code, 2026-11-07)
You say
/supabase-postgres-rules audit this table and its RLS and give me the fixing migration: create table public.orders (id bigint generated always as identity primary key, user_id uuid not null references auth.users(id), total_cents int not null, status text not null default 'pending', created_at timestamptz not null default now()); alter table public.orders enable row level security; grant select, insert, update on public.orders to anon, authenticated; create policy orders_select on public.orders for select using (auth.uid() = user_id); create policy orders_insert on public.orders for insert with check (true); create policy orders_update on public.orders for update using (auth.uid() = user_id); -- about 1.8M rows, no other indexes
Skillv1.0.0

Postgres Rules for Supabase Projects

Use it to make your coding agent follow Supabase's 31 Postgres rules for RLS, indexes, schema and migrations before it touches your database.

No ratings yet0 installs0 savesupdated Nov 7

Install in your agent

Read https://risemi.io/p/supabase-postgres-rules/install.md and follow it to install the "supabase-postgres-rules" skill into this agent.

Paste this into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex or any agent that can read a URL.

Full guide for your agent: https://risemi.io/p/supabase-postgres-rules/install.md

What you get

  • 31 rule files with incorrect vs correct SQL: RLS, indexing, schema design, locking, pagination, connection pooling
  • A rule index ranked by impact that the agent loads on its own when it creates tables, writes policies or reviews a migration
  • you-say.md: six example requests (RLS audit, slow-query index, schema design, migration review) mapped to the rules
  • Upstream attribution and MIT license included (NOTICE.md)

Good fit

  • Founders building on Supabase with a coding agent who want RLS and indexes right from the first table
  • Developers reviewing agent-written migrations and policies before they reach production
  • Teams on any Postgres host who want the agent to follow one written rule set

Not for

  • Supabase client, Auth, Edge Functions or Storage questions; this covers the database only
  • MySQL, SQLite or other databases
  • Deep DBA work such as replication, backups or server tuning

About this skill

Postgres Rules for Supabase Projects

Coding agents write SQL that works on ten rows and falls over on ten million: RLS policies that call auth.uid() once per row, foreign keys without indexes, migrations that lock a busy table, tables exposed to the API with no policy at all. This skill loads Supabase's own Postgres rule set into your agent before it touches the database, so schema changes, policies, indexes and queries follow 31 written rules with incorrect and correct SQL side by side.

How it works. Install it in a project that uses Supabase or any Postgres. The agent loads it on its own when you create or alter tables, write RLS policies, add indexes, write migrations or chase a slow query; you can also call it directly with /supabase-postgres-rules. It opens only the rule files the task needs (for an RLS audit: the RLS basics, RLS performance and privileges rules) and answers with the SQL to run, the rule it applied and, for indexes, the explain analyze to compare before and after.

What you get. SKILL.md with the rule index in eight categories ranked by impact (query performance, connections, security and RLS, schema design, locking, data access, monitoring, advanced features), 31 rule files under references/, and you-say.md, a short Risemi page with six example requests and which rules each one uses.

Based on supabase-postgres-best-practices by Supabase (MIT): https://github.com/supabase/agent-skills

What we changed

  • Renamed the skill to supabase-postgres-rules and normalized the frontmatter to the SKILL.md spec (upstream description kept word for word).
  • Added you-say.md with six example requests (RLS audit, index for a slow query, schema design, migration review, N+1 rewrite, connection errors) and a pointer to it at the end of SKILL.md.
  • Left out the contributor template and writing guide, the changelog and the separate general supabase skill from the same repository.
  • Removed one leftover authoring sentence from references/_sections.md that read as an instruction to replace the section list.
  • Added attribution (NOTICE.md, LICENSES/).

The 31 rule files are the upstream text, unchanged. Upstream has no rule file dedicated to migrations; migration reviews rely on the constraints, locking and foreign-key index rules. Full list of edits in NOTICE.md.

Checked against

The files follow the Agent Skills SKILL.md format: spec-only frontmatter, name matching the folder, description under 1024 characters. Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI and Antigravity read that format from a skills folder. We checked the files against the spec on 2026-11-07, and checked by script that every reference file named in SKILL.md and you-say.md exists. We have not recorded a test session in each agent. The example output on this page comes from a real run of the skill in Claude Code (Claude Opus) on 2026-11-07 with the request shown under "You say"; the migration was not applied to a database.

How to install

Copy the files/ folder of the download to .agents/skills/supabase-postgres-rules/ (Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini CLI, Antigravity) and/or .claude/skills/supabase-postgres-rules/ (Claude Code), or download the zip from this page and unpack it there. Start a new agent session and type /supabase-postgres-rules followed by your request, for example /supabase-postgres-rules audit the RLS on public.orders.

Not affiliated with Supabase Inc.

Similar products

Project: fresh `npm init -y` + `npm i -D vitest typescript` (Vitest 5.1.0, TypeScript strict). Every runner output below is pasted from the actual run.

Behaviour list (simplest first): 1. returns empty for blank input · 2. returns the address trimmed and lowercased when valid · 3. returns malformed when there is no @ · 4. returns malformed when there is more than one @ · 5. returns malformed when the domain has no dot · 6. returns too_long when the address is over 254 characters

Cycle 1: returns empty for blank input

```
[TDD] cycle 1/6  step RED  behaviour: returns empty for blank input
test:    src/validateEmail.test.ts > validateEmail > returns empty for blank input
ran:     npx vitest run src/validateEmail.test.ts -t "returns empty for blank input"
result:  FAIL  Error: Cannot find module './validateEmail' imported from <project>/src/validateEmail.test.ts
reason:  right (the unit under test does not exist yet: missing function, not a typo in the test)
changed: src/validateEmail.test.ts (+8, new file)
next:    minimum code in src/validateEmail.ts
```

```
[TDD] cycle 1/6  step GREEN  behaviour: returns empty for blank input
ran:     npx vitest run src/validateEmail.test.ts -t "returns empty for blank input" --reporter=verbose; npx vitest run src/validateEmail.test.ts
result:  PASS  Tests 1 passed (1)
changed: src/validateEmail.ts (+9, new file: result types + hard-coded `{ ok: false, error: 'empty' }`)
next:    refactor
```

Refactor: no refactor (hard-coded return is forced into the general version by cycle 2).

[Cycles 2–6 follow the same shape: each RED shows a real assertion mismatch such as `Tests 1 failed | 1 skipped (2)`, each GREEN the passing count, with refactors in cycles 5 and 6.]

Done

```
[TDD] DONE  cycles 6  tests added 6  suite PASS
ran:     npm test   (vitest run)   and   npx tsc -p .
result:  Test Files  1 passed (1) | Tests  6 passed (6); tsc exit 0
pre-existing failures: none (no tests existed)
found, not fixed: the 254 boundary itself (exactly 254 chars accepted) has no test; it passes today, so a test would be green on first run. 'a@.com' and 'a@b.' are accepted because the spec only asks for a dot in the domain.
```

No-fake-green check before every GREEN: no `.skip`/`.todo`, no assertion weakened, no test-only branch, nothing mocked.
SkillCodeFree
  • Antigravity
  • Claude Code
  • Codex
  • +3
Coding

Red-Green TDD Loop

Use it to make your coding agent build every change test-first: one failing test, the minimum code, a refactor, and a status block after each step.

0 installs
Free
Assumption: no n8n-MCP server is connected in this session, so I took the skill's fallback path: I wrote the workflow JSON directly from the bundled rules and checked it by review (a rule-check script plus a dry run of every expression). The real validator (`validate_workflow`) was not run, and nothing was deployed.

How the skill routed this

| Step | Sub-skill used | What it decided |
|---|---|---|
| Shape | `n8n-workflow-patterns` | Webhook processing pattern: Webhook, then Validate, then Action, then Respond |
| Node parameters | `n8n-node-configuration` | Slack post needs a channel and text. `responseMode: "responseNode"`. `options.responseCode` set on every Respond node. UUID node ids, no placeholder credentials |
| Expressions | `n8n-expression-syntax` | Webhook data lives under `.body`. Use `$('Webhook').item.json.body.*` once past the IF node. `=` prefix on every expression field |
| Error paths | `n8n-error-handling` | Slack gets `onError: "continueErrorOutput"` and its `main[1]` is wired to the 500 responder. `retryOnFail` is on. Bad input is caught upstream and gets a 400 |
| Validation | `n8n-validation-expert` | Runtime-profile checks done by review. Security warnings get fixed (header auth on the webhook) |

```
Webhook ──> Validate Input ──true──> Post to #signups ──success (main[0])──> Respond 200 OK
                        └──false──> Respond 400 Invalid Input
                                     Post to #signups ──error (main[1])────> Respond 500 Slack Failed
```

Validation result (excerpt)

```
PASS  Webhook responseMode is responseNode (Respond nodes control the reply)
PASS  Every branch (success and each error) ends at a Respond to Webhook node: no hanging branch
PASS  'Post to #signups': onError=continueErrorOutput AND main[1] wired
PASS  'Post to #signups': retryOnFail with maxTries <= 5 and waitBetweenTries <= 5000
PASS  Every {{ }} field starts with = (no 'Expression requires = prefix' error)
PASS  Webhook fields read from .body, never $json.name / $json.email / $json.plan
…
43 passed, 0 failed
```

Expression dry run against sample webhook items:

```
valid           IF -> true  (Slack)  Slack text: New signup: Ana Lima (ana@example.com) on pro
missing_plan    IF -> false (400)
bad_email       IF -> false (400)
no_body         IF -> false (400)
500 body:   {"error":"upstream_error","message":"The signup was received but could not be posted to Slack. Please retry later."}
```

Not verified without the server: the node typeVersions (Webhook 2.2, IF 2.3, Slack 2.3, Respond 1.5) and the Slack v2 parameter names; confirm by opening the nodes after import.

[The full answer also holds the six-node list, the importable workflow JSON and the expressions table with the reason behind each one.]
SkillCodePro
  • Antigravity
  • Claude Code
  • Codex
  • +4
Coding

n8n Builder Skills for Coding Agents

Use it to have your coding agent build, configure and validate n8n workflows without the usual expression and node-config mistakes.

0 installs
$12.99
2. Tool design

| Tool | Does | Inputs (constraints) | Returns | Read-only / destructive | Errors the model can fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| `find_customers` | Customers whose name or email contains the text, case-insensitive | `query` string 1–100 (trimmed), `limit` int 1–50 = 20, `cursor` optional | id, name, email; `next_cursor` | read-only, idempotent | no match: try a shorter part of the name or the email domain |
| `list_customer_orders` | One customer's orders, newest first | `customer_id` int ≥ 1, `status` enum optional, `limit`, `cursor` | customer + orders; `next_cursor` | read-only, idempotent | unknown customer: call `find_customers` |
| `get_order` | One order with the customer's name and email | `order_id` int ≥ 1 | order + customer (structured) | read-only, idempotent | not found: check the number or list the customer's orders |
| `refund_order` | Sets a paid order to refunded | `order_id` int ≥ 1, `confirm` int optional, must equal `order_id` | updated order, `previous_status: "paid"` | destructive, idempotent | no `confirm`: preview, ask the user; order pending or already refunded; not found |

Checklist notes: one rule for empty results (an `isError` result with a next step), applied to every tool. All SQL is parameterized. Read tools use a read-only SQLite handle; only `refund_order` opens a writable one, and its `UPDATE ... WHERE id = ? AND status = 'paid'` is a single statement. The guard on the destructive tool is server-side (the preview/confirm step), not just the `destructiveHint` annotation.

3. Scaffold

From `templates/typescript-server.md`. Installed: `@modelcontextprotocol/server` 2.4.0, `@modelcontextprotocol/client` 2.4.0, `zod` 4.6.7; Node 24.6.0.

```
build-an-mcp-server/
  data/seed.sql, data/shop.db     3 customers, 5 orders
  src/index.ts                    stdio entry point
  src/server.ts                   createServer(): the four tools
  src/shop.ts                     SQLite client module (the system being wrapped)
  test/smoke.ts                   spawns the server over stdio, calls every tool
```

5. Test (Inspector CLI, eval loop layer 2)

```
$ npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector --cli npx tsx src/index.ts --method tools/call --tool-name get_order --tool-arg order_id=1001
{
  "content": [{ "type": "text", "text": "Order #1001 for Ada Lovelace <ada@example.com>: $49.99, paid, created 2026-10-02T09:15:00Z" }],
  "structuredContent": { "order": { "id": 1001, "customer_id": 1, "total_cents": 4999, "status": "paid", "created_at": "2026-10-02T09:15:00Z", "customer_name": "Ada Lovelace", "customer_email": "ada@example.com" } }
}
```

Built, tested, not tested

- Built: four tools over `data/shop.db`, server-side preview/confirm guard on `refund_order`, smoke test, configs for Claude Code, Codex and Cursor, README.
- Tested: starter smoke (pass), full smoke test 14 checks (pass), strict typecheck (pass), Inspector CLI call (pass), seed database unchanged after tests.
- Not tested: the Inspector web UI by hand and the model check (running the five real requests through a live Claude Code session and recording which tool it picks).

[The full answer also holds `src/shop.ts`, `src/server.ts`, `test/smoke.ts` and the three client config snippets.]
SkillCodePro
  • Antigravity
  • Claude Code
  • Codex
  • +3
Coding

Build an MCP Server

Use it to design, build, test and ship an MCP server your agents use well: 3 to 7 well-designed tools, a tested starter and ready client configs.

0 installs
$12.99
Phase 1: Root cause investigation
Full suite: FAIL test_expired_coupon_rejected_twice (tests/test_checkout.py:16) AssertionError: Coupon(code='OLD50', …expires_at=2020-01-01…) is not None.
In isolation the same test fails at a different line (17): AssertionError: 50.0 != 100.0. So the first lookup in a process is rejected and every later lookup is accepted; in the full suite the first lookup was done by test_expired_coupon_rejected. Cross-test pollution through module-level state.
Cache probe at the boundary: cache before [] → 1st None → cache after ['OLD50'] → 2nd Coupon(OLD50). Docstring says the cache was added in 3f2a1c9 "to cut DB reads": that is the regression point.
Trace (root-cause-tracing.md): apply_coupon → get_coupon → `if code in _CACHE: return _CACHE[code]`. get_coupon writes the coupon to _CACHE before the expiry check, and the cache-hit branch has no expiry check at all.

Phase 2: Pattern analysis
Working path: cache miss → _load → expiry check. Broken path: cache hit. Expiry depends on `now`, passed per call, so it cannot be a cached property; "don't cache expired coupons" alone would still serve a coupon cached while valid after it expires.

Phase 3: Hypothesis
"get_coupon returns cached coupons without re-checking expires_at against the caller's now; the cache was added around the lookup but the validity check stayed only on the miss path." Confirmed by the probe above.

Phase 4: Implementation
Failing test first: test_cached_coupon_rechecked_for_expiry (look up while valid, then after expiry) plus a setUp that clears the module cache. Before the fix: 5 tests, 2 failures, both for the expected reason.
Fix at the source: the cache stores the raw record; the expiry check runs on every lookup, cached or not.

    c = _CACHE.get(code)
    if c is None:
        c = _load(code)
        if c is None:
            return None
        _CACHE[code] = c
    if c.expires_at < now:
        return None
    return c

Verification: python3 -m unittest -v → Ran 5 tests … OK. The originally failing test in isolation, 3 runs: OK, OK, OK. Fix attempts: 1.
SkillCodePro
  • Claude Code
  • Codex
  • Copilot
  • +2
Coding

Systematic Debugging Loop

Stops your coding agent from guessing: root cause first, one hypothesis at a time, failing test before the fix.

0 installs
$9.99
Scope: app/dashboard/page.tsx and the modules it imports (components/charts, UsageCard, ProjectList, RichTextEditor, lib/api.ts).

| # | Rule | File:line | Impact | Finding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | async-dependencies | app/dashboard/page.tsx:8-10 | CRITICAL | getProjects(user.id) and getUsage(user.id) depend only on `user` but are awaited one after the other: 3 sequential round trips before any HTML is sent, where 2 would do. Promise.all them. |
| 2 | bundle-barrel-imports | components/ProjectList.tsx:3 | CRITICAL | `import _ from 'lodash'` in a 'use client' file ships all of lodash for one sortBy. Use lodash/sortBy, or toSorted / localeCompare. |
| 3 | async-suspense-boundaries | app/dashboard/page.tsx:7-19 | HIGH | The whole page, including the static shell and RichTextEditor, waits for all three fetches. Move usage and projects into async children in <Suspense> so the shell streams first. |
| 4 | server-serialization | app/dashboard/page.tsx:16 | HIGH | The raw projects array goes to client ProjectList, which reads only id, name and status. Map to {id, name, status} on the server. |
| 5 | rerender-no-inline-components | components/ProjectList.tsx:7 | HIGH | `Row` is defined inside ProjectList, so every keystroke in the filter remounts every <li>. Interaction cost, not first load. Hoist Row. |
| 6 | rerender-derived-state-no-effect | components/UsageCard.tsx:4-5 | MEDIUM | percent is kept in state and set in useEffect: server HTML renders "0% of plan used" and the real value appears only after hydration. Compute it during render. |

Score: 62 / 100 (100 − 2×10 CRITICAL − 3×5 HIGH − 1×3 MEDIUM). This counts rule findings; it is not a measured load time.

Checked and not scored: the local charts barrel (five tiny stubs, tree-shakeable); RichTextEditor is a <textarea> today, so no dynamic import yet. Not a performance rule but it blocks the build: components/charts/index.ts re-exports names the chart files do not export, and page.tsx reads `params.id` synchronously though params is a Promise in Next 15.

What makes the first load slow, in order:
1. The server waterfall (rows 1 and 3). Parallelizing projects and usage removes one full round trip; Suspense lets the header paint after only getUser.
2. Client JS weight (row 2). A one-line import change.
3. Payload and first-paint correctness (rows 4 and 6).
Row 5 is an interaction cost; fix it after the others. Fixes were not requested, so no files were changed.
SkillCodePro
  • Claude Code
  • Codex
  • Copilot
  • +2
Coding

React Performance Rules

70 prioritized performance rules for React and Next.js that your agent applies while coding and scores in review.

0 installs
$9.99

Questions about this skill

How do I install it?

Pick the tab that suits you above. The easiest way is to paste the one-line prompt into your agent: it reads the install guide, signs you in once with a code from your email and writes the skill into the right folder. You can also run the CLI command or unzip the ZIP by hand.

Which agents does it run in?

It was tested on Antigravity, Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI. Any agent that reads SKILL.md folders can load it; the Manual tab lists the folder each one uses.

What if it doesn't work?

Write to hello@risemi.io within 7 days of buying and we refund you. Tell us which agent you used and we will fix the skill for everyone.